The issue of substantial relationship in Metropolitan v. Syntek, law homework help

The issue of substantial relationship in Metropolitan v. Syntek, law homework help

The issue of substantial relationship in Metropolitan v. Syntek was introduced due to the role of the Hughes & Luce Law firm, which represented Metropolitan Life Insurance Company but had previously represented Gene Phillips, the controlling share owner of Syntek Finance Corporation.[1]

In 1986, Hughes & Luce provided counsel to Mr. Phillips during a divorce, and subsequently drafted a prenuptial agreement.[2] During that period, Mr. Phillips provided detailed information covering his personal finances, and the organization of his companies.[3] The information introduced during this period laid the groundwork for the motion to disqualify Hughes & Luce made in Metropolitan v. Syntek.[4]