HRM532 Talent Management

Please include an introduction and a conclusion, also use an additional 3 references / intext citations

From the Goldsmith & Carter textbook, select either the Bank of America (Chapter 2) or McDonald’s (Chapter 9) case study for this assignment.

Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you:

  1. Outline the talent management program that led to success for the company.
  2. Identify strengths of the program and how they led to goal accomplishment.
  3. Describe opportunities for improvement in the talent management planning process.
  4. Create at least two (2) more effective approaches to meet the talent management challenges in the future.
  5. Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Points: 150

Assignment 1: Bank of America or McDonald’s Case Study

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Outline the talent management program that led to success for the company.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely outlined the talent management program that led to success for the company.

Partially outlined the talent management program that led to success for the company.

Satisfactorily outlined the talent management program that led to success for the company.

Thoroughly outlined the talent management program that led to success for the company.

2. Identify strengths of the program and how they led to goal accomplishment.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely identified strengths of the program and how they led to goal accomplishment.

Partially identified strengths of the program and how they led to goal accomplishment.

Satisfactorily identified strengths of the program and how they led to goal accomplishment.

Thoroughly identified strengths of the program and how they led to goal accomplishment.

3. Describe opportunities for improvement in the talent management planning process.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely described opportunities for improvement in the talent management planning process.

Partially described opportunities for improvement in the talent management planning process.

Satisfactorily described opportunities for improvement in the talent management planning process.

Thoroughly described opportunities for improvement in the talent management planning process.

4. Create at least two (2) more effective approaches to meet the talent management challenges in the future.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) more effective approaches to meet the talent management challenges in the future.

Partially created at least two (2) more effective approaches to meet the talent management challenges in the future.

Satisfactorily created at least two (2)more effective approaches to meet the talent management challenges in the future.

Thoroughly created at least two (2)more effective approaches to meet the talent management challenges in the future.

5. References

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present