Construct constitutive and operational definitions, assignment help

Construct constitutive and operational definitions, assignment help

(Note: Refer to Chapter 6 Review Question 4 for criterion 1.)

1. Construct constitutive and operational definitions for any three (3) of the actions and outcome variables listed in the shaded box under Review Question 1 at the end of Chapter 6. (Note: The box includes Program expenditure, Equality of educational opportunity, Energy consumption, etc.) 

(Note: Refer to Chapter 6 Review Question 5 for criterion 2.)
2. Identify three (3) policy problems listed in the shaded box under Review Question 5 and determine an appropriate indicator or index that would help determine whether each of the identified problems are being solved through government action. Justify your position on each. (Note: The box includes Work alienation, School dropouts, Poverty, etc.)
(Note: Refer to Chapter 6 Review Question 13 for criterion 3.)

3. Construct valid rebuttals to the following argument using at least four (4) threats to validity: (B) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (W) The enforcement of the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the speed limit. (I) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per 100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit. (C) The 55-mph speed limit (National Speed Law of 1973) has been definitely successful in saving lives. 

4. Include at least two (2) peer-reviewed references (no more than five [5] years old) from material outside the textbook to support your views. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental Websites. Do not use open source Websites such as Wikipedia, Sparknotes.com, Ask.com, and similar Websites are not acceptable resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
• Examine the nature, characteristics, models, and / or methods pertinent to the structuring of policy problems.
• Compare and contrast approaches and / or techniques for prescribing preferred policies.
• Evaluate policy outcomes by applying a variety of methods and techniques.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in policy analysis and program evaluation. 
• Write clearly and concisely about policy analysis and program evaluation using proper writing mechanics.

Rubric

Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.

 

Assignment 4: Policy Outcomes

Assignment 4: Policy Outcomes

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Construct constitutive and operational definitions for any three (3) of the actions and outcome variables listed in the shaded box under Review Question 1 at the end of Chapter 6. Weight: 25%

threshold: pts

Thoroughly constructed constitutive and operational definitions for any three (3) of the actions and outcome variables listed in the shaded box under Review Question 1 at the end of Chapter 6.

27.0 pts

Satisfactorily constructed constitutive and operational definitions for any three (3) of the actions and outcome variables listed in the shaded box under Review Question 1 at the end of Chapter 6.

23.0 pts

Partially constructed constitutive and operational definitions for any three (3) of the actions and outcome variables listed in the shaded box under Review Question 1 at the end of Chapter 6.

20.0 pts

Did not submit or incompletely constructed constitutive and operational definitions for any three (3) of the actions and outcome variables listed in the shaded box under Review Question 1 at the end of Chapter 6.

0.0 pts

 pts 

27.0 pts

Additional Comments

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identify three (3) policy problems listed in the shaded box under Review Question 5 and determine an appropriate indicator or index that would help determine whether each of the identified problems are being solved through government action. Justify your position on each. Weight: 30%

threshold: pts

Thoroughly identified three (3) policy problems listed in the shaded box under Review Question 5 and thoroughly determined an appropriate indicator or index that would help determine whether each of the identified problems are being solved through government action. Thoroughly justified your position on each.

33.0 pts

Satisfactorily identified three (3) policy problems listed in the shaded box under Review Question 5 and satisfactorily determined an appropriate indicator or index that would help determine whether each of the identified problems are being solved through government action. Satisfactorily justified your position on each

28.0 pts

Partially identified three (3) policy problems listed in the shaded box under Review Question 5 and partially determined an appropriate indicator or index that would help determine whether each of the identified problems are being solved through government action. Partially justified your position on each

25.0 pts

Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) policy problems listed in the shaded box under Review Question 5 and did not submit or incompletely determined an appropriate indicator or index that would help determine whether each of the identified problems are being solved through government action. Did not submit or incompletely justified your position on each.

0.0 pts

 pts 

33.0 pts

Additional Comments

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Construct valid rebuttals to the following argument using at least four threats to validity: (B) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (W) The enforcement of the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the speed limit. (I) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per 100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit. (C) The 55-mph speed limit (National Speed Law of 1973) has been definitely successful in saving lives. Weight: 30%

threshold: pts

Thoroughly constructed valid rebuttals to the following argument using at least four threats to validity: (B) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (W) The enforcement of the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the speed limit. (I) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per 100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit. (C) The 55-mph speed limit (National Speed Law of 1973) has been definitely successful in saving lives

33.0 pts

Satisfactorily constructed valid rebuttals to the following argument using at least four threats to validity: (B) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (W) The enforcement of the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the speed limit. (I) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per 100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit. (C) The 55-mph speed limit (National Speed Law of 1973) has been definitely successful in saving lives.

28.0 pts

Partially constructed valid rebuttals to the following argument using at least four threats to validity: (B) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (W) The enforcement of the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the speed limit. (I) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per 100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit. (C) The 55-mph speed limit (National Speed Law of 1973) has been definitely successful in saving lives.

25.0 pts

Did not submit or incompletely constructed valid rebuttals to the following argument using at least four threats to validity: (B) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (W) The enforcement of the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the speed limit. (I) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per 100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit. (C) The 55-mph speed limit (National Speed Law of 1973) has been definitely successful in saving lives.

0.0 pts

 pts 

33.0 pts

Additional Comments

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 2 references Weight: 5%

threshold: pts

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6.0 pts

Meets number of required references; most references quality choices.

5.0 pts

Meets the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

4.0 pts

Does not meet the required number of references

0.0 pts

 pts 

6.0 pts

Additional Comments

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%

threshold: pts

0-2 errors present

11.0 pts

3-4 errors present

9.0 pts

5-6 errors present

8.0 pts

More than 6 errors present

0.0 pts

 pts 

11.0 pts

Additional Comments